Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 22, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a certificate of need case and the other is a direct criminal appeal.

Singing River Health Systems v. Mississippi State Department of Health, 2025-SA-00614-SCT (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision affirming the state health officer’s approval of a CON application, holding that there was substantial evidence that the the CON application complied with the requirements, that there was substantial evidence that the hearing officer substantially complied with procedure, that the hearing officer’s determination of economic vitality was not arbitrary and capricious, that the hearing officer was within her discretion to weight conflicting evidence regarding adverse impact, and that substantial evidence supported that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse effect on another facility’s ability to provide charitable care.
(7-0)

Pegues v. State, 2024-KA-01001-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, holding that the State did not commit prosecutorial misconduct by commenting on the defendant’s failure to call witnesses or the defendant exercising his right to a jury trial and holding that there was sufficient evidence of constructive evidence.
(7-0)

Other Orders

  • Parrott v. Frierson, 2023-CT-01245-SCT (denying cert)
  • Fisher v. All About Painting and Cleaning, Inc., 2023-CT-01289-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mohiuddin v. Jackson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors, 2024-CA-00759-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • Crabtree v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 2024-FC-00827-SCT (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 20, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down three opinions today. There is an impressive variety today with a personal injury case tried to verdict, an estate case, and a capital murder conviction.

ABL Management, Inc. v. Rowell, 2024-CA-01007-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming judgment for the plaintiff after the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in a personal injury claim against the company that oversaw and managed the kitchen were the plaintiff was injured, holding that the trial court did not err by denying an JNOV, in denying a motion for new trial, or in denying a remittitur.
(7-3: McCarty for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Carlton and Wilson)

In the Matter of the Estate of Dorris: Moore v. Estate of Dorris, 2024-CA-00820-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s order denying a creditor’s motion to reopen an estate to claim a one-half interest in real property, holding that the record contained no evidence of fraud, mistake, or illegality concerning the prior resolution of the creditor’s claim or of fraud on the court.
(8-2-0: Carlton for the Court; McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks concurred in the result only without writing)

Wright v. State, 2024-KA-00225-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of capital murder and life in prison without eligibility for parole, holding that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress or motion in limine regarding text messages obtained from the defendant’s cell phone.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Brookshire v. State, 2023-KA-00966-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Taylor v. State, 2023-KA-01201-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Taylor v. Fair,  2024-CP-00676-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Russell v. Booneville Police Department, 2024-CP-00757-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Cardwell v. State, 2024-CP-01088-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 15, 2026

The Mississippi Supreme Court did not hand down any opinions today. Just four orders were listed including one cert grant.

Other Orders

  • Magyar v. Shiers, 2023-CT-00682-SCT (denying cert)
  • Shipley v. Shipley, 2023-CT-00814-SCT (granting cert)
  • Bradford v. State, 2025-M-00649- (order the State to file a response to an application for leave to file petition for post-conviction relief)
  • In Re: Resignation of Eason, 2025-BD-01394-SCT (granting petition to resign from the bar in good standing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 13, 2026

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions today. There is a couple of domestic relations cases, one of which turns on an appellate jurisdiction issue. Then there are two direct criminal appeals, an MTCA case, and attorney’s fees case.

In Re Guardianship of K.G.W.: Garland v. Bunch, 2024-CA-01325-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Dismissing appeal stemming from a guardianship, holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction on the appeal taken under section 11-43-53 because there had been no trial of a habeas corpus.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

O’Quin v. Davaul, 2024-CP-01327-COA (Civil – State Boards & Agencies)
Affirming dismissal of a complaint against the county tax assessor and granting judgment on the pleadings for failing to comply with MTCA requirements, holding that the pro se appellant’s arguments were without merit and were procedurally barred for failing to comply with the rules of appellate procedure.
(10-0: Lassitter St. Pe’ for the Court)

Fraser v. State, 2023-KA-01129-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of culpable negligence manslaughter, holding that even if admission of emails and photographs from the victim’s phone showing past abuse was error it was harmless, that the trial court did not err in admitting an email from the defendant into evidence or in limiting the defendant’s expert witness’s testimony, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.
(8-2-0: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Elkins v. State, 2024-KA-00597-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that there were no issues warranting reversal after reviewing counsel’s Lindsey brief and the record.
(10-0: Emfinger for the Court)

Covington County Bank v. Scott Tractor & Equipment Company, 2024-CA-01071-COA (Civil – Contract)
Reversing the circuit court’s denial of attorney’s fees, holding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the request for attorney’s fees that was sought after the defendant paid the debt with accrued interest on the same day the creditor filed a motion for entry of default.
(7-3: Westbrooks for the Court; Emfinger dissented, joined by Wilson and Lawrence)

Aultman v. Aultman, 2024-CA-00746-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part in a divorce case, holding that the chancellor erred with respect to the valuation of a home and remanding to reconsider valuation and equitable distribution but holding that the chancellor did not err in valuing an ESIP, retirement, and PERS accounts, did not err in awarding attorney’s fees for successful contempt proceedings.
(8-1-0: Carlton for the Court: Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lassitter St. Pe’ did not participate)

Other Orders

  • Ryals v. State, 2023-KA-01192-COA (ordering the circuit clerk to supplement the appellate record with the transcript of the jury instruction conference by a date certain and further ordering that if it is not received by that date that the court reporter shall appear before the Court at a show cause hearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of January 8, 2026

While Judge Maxwell and Judge Chamberlin adjust to their new roles on federal bench, the seven remaining members of the Mississippi Supreme Court soldier on dispensing justice on the State’s Highest Court. Today, they handed down two opinions in direct criminal appeals.

Wallace v. State, 2024-KA-00413-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of aggravated assault, holding that the indictment was not defective and that the defendant was estopped from arguing on appeal that the indictment was constructively amended by a jury instruction, that the evidence was sufficient, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for new trial that asserted new evidence.
(7-0: Sullivan for the Court)

Hollingsworth v. State, 2024-KA-00908-SCT (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth, holding that it was not error for the prosecutor to make a statement about a witness who was not called because the witness was more accessible to the defendant than the State.
(7-0: Coleman for the Court)

Hand Downs

  • In Re: Court Improvement Program Statewide Multi-Disciplinary Task Force, 89-R-99037-SCT (appointing members of the Court Improvement Program Statewide Disciplinary Task Force)
  • Stephney v. State, 2023-CT-00936-SCT (denying cert)
  • Tubbs v. State, 2023-KA-01124-SCT (granting Office of Indigent Appeals’ motion for authority to pay contract counsel)
  • Quinn v. State, 2023-CT-01143-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mi Pueblo Mexican Restaurant, LLC v. Breakfast Cove, LLC, 2024-CA-00271-SCT (granting motion to stay appeal and ordering the trial court to rule on a Rule 60(b) motion)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-CT-00875-SCT (dismissing pro se cert petition)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of January 6, 2026

Happy New Year! The Mississippi Court of Appeals wasted no time getting up and running. They kicked the year off with six opinions. Amidst the PCR opinions is a couple of noteworthy tales of caution for litigants pertaining to discovery and appellate procedure.

Seals v. State, 2024-KM-00448-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming conviction of simple assault, holding that that the evidence was sufficient and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(8-1-0: Weddle for the Court; Westbrooks concurred in result only without writing; Emfinger did not participate)

Simoneaux v. State, 2024-CP-01127-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of the petitioner’s fourth PCR motion, holding that the motion was time-barred, successive, and failed to to demonstrate that a statutory exception applies.
(9-0: Weddle for the Court; McCarty did not participate)

Patton v. MDOC, 2024-CA-00699-COA (Civil – Personal Injury)
Affirming dismissal for the plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion dismissing the claim as a sanction for violating the rules of discovery and the court’s order compelling discovery.
(8-2: Emfinger for the Court; Westbrooks and McDonald dissented without writing)

Vasques v. State, 2024-CP-00852-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the dismissal of a PCR motion, holding that the circuit court did not err in summarily dismissing the motion as time-barred and that the circuit court’s err in not transferring the motion to the proper venue was harmless because the motion lacked merit.
(7-3-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson and Weddle concurred in part and in the result without writing’ Emfinger concurred in result only without writing)

Polk v. State, 2025-CP-00260-COA (Civil – PCR)
Affirming dismissal of PCR motions, holding that several of the claims were waived or procedurally barred and that the dismissal was proper because the petitioner raised no challenge to the validity of his guilty plea.
(9-0: McDonald for the Court; Weddle did not participate)

Ford Motor Company v. Bingham, 2024-CA-01056-COA (Civil – Other)
Affirming the circuit court’s judgment granting a motion to dismiss the appeal and awarding attorney’s fees, holding that the appellant did not comply with the cost bond requirement, that the “appeal bond with supersedeas” did not qualify as a cost bond, that the appellant did not demonstrate “extenuating circumstances” to excuse the jurisdictional defect, affirming the award of attorney’s fees, and denying the motion to dismiss the instant appeal.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Taylor v. State, 2023-CT-00738-SCT (denying motion to vacate opinion and dismiss appeal and motion for rehearing)
  • Thomas v. State, 2023-CT-01151-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Cooper v. State, 2024-KA-00592-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Ruffin v. State, 2024-CA-00867-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 16, 2025

As the year draws the a close, the Mississippi Court of Appeals is finishing strong with seven opinions handed down today. There were three domestic relations cases, two felony appeals, one misdemeanor appeal, and an undue influence case.

Rasbeery v. State, 2024-KA-01005-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of possession of meth with a firearm enhancement, holding that the conviction of constructive possession was supported by sufficient evidence, that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, and that the trial court did not err in denying a motion suppress the defendant’s roadside statements.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

Lucas v. Estate of Lucas, 2024-CA-01259-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancellor’s decision invalidating a gift and setting aside a deed, holding that the grantee did not provide sufficient evidence overcome the presumption of undue influence.
(10-0: McCarty for the Court)

J.T.S. v. M.L.S., 2024-CA-00023-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming in part and reversing in part a chancellor’s decision in a divorce case, holding that the Court had appellate jurisdiction, that the chancery court did not in dismissing several counts of the amended complaint, that the chancellor did err in modifying the life insurance provision of the divorce agreement, that the chancellor did not err in enforcing a provision limiting reimbursement of medical expenses, that the chancellor did not err in assessing post-judgment interest, that the chancellor did not err in finding that one party had no obligation to contribute to condo or allowance expenses, that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion in crediting payments as child support, that the chancellor did err in awarding attorney’s fees without specific findings, and that there was no merit to the claim that the chancellor was impartial.
(7-1-0: McDonald for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Lawrence and St. Pe’ did not participate)

Turner v. State, 2024-KM-01020-COA, consolidated with 2024-KM-01028-COA (Criminal – Misdemeanor)
Affirming convictions of speeding and careless driving on appeal from justice court, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction which was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and that the trial court did not impermissibly place the burden of proof on the defendant.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Odom v. State, 2023-KA-01165-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of first-degree murder and armed robbery, holding that the jury was not so improperly instructed on self-defense as to warrant reversal and that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction.
(9-1-0: Wilson for the Court; Barnes concurred in part and in the result without writing)

Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 2024-CA-00882-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming judgment of contempt, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding the ex-husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court-ordered alimony or in reducing his monthly periodic alimony payment.
(10-0: Barnes for the Court)

Thornton v. Thornton, 2024-CA-00320-COA (Civil – Domestic Relations)
Affirming the chancellor’s judgment in a divorce case, holding that the chancery court did not abuse its discretion awarding joint legal and physical custody, that the chancellor did not err in distribution of marital property or in personal property.
(7-1-2: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Carlton concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by McCarty)

Other Orders

  • Parra v. Rapid-American Corporation, 2023-CA-01196-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Buck v. State, 2024-KA-00025-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Tauzin v. Tauzin, 2024-CA-00141-COA (denying rehearing)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 11, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions today. One is a voluntary dismissal versus summary judgment dispute and the other addressed where venue was waived by removal to federal court once the case was remanded. There are also two cert grants among today’s orders.

Busby v. The Lamar Company, LLC, 2023-CA-00892-SCT (Civil – Torts)
Affirming the trial court’s decision to grant the plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal and deny the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and for attorney’s fees, explaining that the only difference in the outcome is the award of attorney’s fees which is within the trial court’s discretion.
(8-0: Maxwell for the Court; Branning did not participate)

Benchmark Insurance Company v. Harris, 2024-IA-00813-SCT (Civil – Insurance)
Reversing the trial court’s decision denying the defendant’s motion to transfer venue, holding that the defendant did not waive its objection to venue by first removing the case to federal court (to a district that encompassed both the improper and proper state court venues) prior to filing an answer in state court and then filing a motion to transfer venue on remand.
(9-0: Maxwell for the Court)

Other Orders

  • Elmore v. Elmore, 2023-CT-00875-SCT (granting cert)
  • McFall v. Osborne, 2023-CT-01234-SCT (denying cert)
  • Mortera v. Kona Villa Owners Association, Inc., 2023-CT-01297-SCT (granting cert)
  • Okorie v. Citizens Bank, 2024-CT-00462-SCT (denying cert)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Court of Appeals Decisions of December 9, 2025

The Mississippi Court of Appeals handed down six opinions yesterday. Three are appeals of felony convictions and the others are an heirship case, a worker’s comp case, and a reversal in a PCR case.

Oats v. State, 2024-KA-00278-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of manslaughter, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for mistrial after the jury declared itself hung and that the issue was doubly procedurally-barred and that the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the overwhelming weight of it.
(7-3: Lawrence for the Court; McDonald dissented without writing; Westbrook dissented, joined by McDonald and Lassitter St. Pe’)

Chamblee v. State, 2024-KA-00556-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of one count of gratification of lust, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue, in denying a motion for mistrial, in excluding false-accusation evidence, or in excluding sexually explicit photographs, and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

Physicians’ Pain and Spin Specialists, PLLC v. Kluczkowski, 2025-WC-00069-COA (Civil – Workers’ Comp)
Affirming the MWCC’s finding that the employer was subject to the MWCA and that the claimant sustained a compensable injury, holding that there was substantial evidence that the employer regularly employed at least five employees and that the claimant presented substantial evidence of a compensable injury.
(10-0: McDonald for the Court)

O’Callaghan v. State, 2024-KA-00415-COA (Criminal – Felony)
Affirming conviction of two counts of possession of a controlled substance, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding holding trial in absentia or in denying the defendant’s motion for mistrial based on a juror’s remark.
(7-3-0: Carlton for the Court; Westbrooks and McCarty concurred in part and in the result without writing; McDonald concurred in result only without writing)

Estate of Dorsey v. Matory, 2024-CA-00925-COA (Civil – Wills, Trusts & Estates)
Affirming the chancery court’s judgment in an heirship dispute, holding that the chancellor did not err in finding that a prior adoption petition and proceeding constituted an adjudication of paternity of and legitimacy, that the adopted child was an heir-at-law of his biological father entitled to a share of his estate, or that equity favored not applying the one-year statute of limitations.
(8-2-0: Barnes for the Court; Wilson concurred in part and in the result without writing; Westbrooks specially concurred, joined by McDonald and McCarty)

Shelton v. State, 2024-CA-00435-COA (Civil – PCR)
Reversing the denial of a PCR petition, holding that the circuit court clearly erred in holding that a revised State’s expert opinion does not merit reversal and that arguments regarding ineffective assistance and factual innocence are moot since the case was remanded for new trial.
(7-3: Barnes for the Court; Emfinger concurred in part and dissented in part, joined by Lawrence and Weddle)

Other Orders

  • Moyer v. Blades, 2023-CA-01180-COA (denying rehearing)
  • James v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport, 2024-CA-00459 (denying rehearing)
  • Snyder v. Pilger, 2024-CA_00460-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Carroll v. State, 2024-KA-00481-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion for additional time to file motion for rehearing)
  • Cole v. Fish, 2024-CA-00508-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Corr Properties, LLC v. City of Oxford, 2024-CC-00665-COA (denying rehearing)
  • Graves v. State, 2024-KA-00691-COA (recalling mandate and granting pro se motion to file motion for rehearing otu of time)
  • Haddad v. State, 2025-TS-01229-COA (dismissing application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and granting time for the pro se appellat to file the motion in circuit court)
  • Reid v. State, 2025-TS-01261-COA (suspending deadling to file appeal to allow appeal to proceed on its merits)

Hand Down Page

Mississippi Supreme Court Decisions of December 4, 2025

The Mississippi Supreme Court handed down two opinions yesterday. The most interesting is technically an adoption case, but it involves jurisdictional issues, unwritten local chancery court rules, appellate procedure, and appellate remedies. Both the majority opinion and the partial concurrence/partial dissent are worth your time.

Wiggins v. Southern Securities Group, LLC, 2024-CA-00251-SCT (Civil – Contract)
Affirming the trial court’s decision in a contract/business dispute, holding that the trial court did not err in granting one side’s motion for preliminary injunction or in denying the other side’s motion to compel mediation and/or arbitration.
(8-1: Griffis for the Court; Coleman dissented)

In the Matter of L.L.T.: Prince v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, 2024-IA-00824-SCT (Civil – Adoption)
Affirming the youth court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction to finalize an adoption against a backdrop of the chancery court refusing set a hearing on adoption petitions, holding that the youth court did not err in finding that it lacked jurisdiction since chancery courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
(5-4: Coleman for the Court; Randolph dissented, joined by Ishee, Griffis, and Branning)

Note – The procedural posture of this one is strange as a result of the chancery court refusing to set a hearing on adoption petitions. The petitioner got creative and initiated the youth court action to create a record for an appeal so that they could seek relief from the appellate courts. The youth court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner was able to appeal. On appeal, the majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction but held that they could not provide any relief other than to affirm the youth court because no other relief was specifically sought. The Supreme Court made it clear that the chancery court should act, but found that it lacked a mechanism based on the issue presented on appeal to compel the chancery court to act. Here is how the majority opinion concluded:

The partial concurrence/partial dissent agreed that the youth court lacked jurisdiction, but was less diplomatic about the chancery court’s conduct and disagreed that Supreme Court’s hands are tied on this appeal:

Other Orders

  • McGee v. State, 2023-CT-00083-SCT (denying cert)
  • Childs v. State, 2023-CT-00126-SCT (denying cert)
  • In the Matter of Estate of Johnson: Manners v. Estate of Johnson, 2023-CT-00823-SCT (denying rehearing)
  • McNaughton v. State, 2023-CT-01099-SCT (denying cert)
  • Caffey v. Forrest Health, 2023-CT-01232-SCT (denying cert)
  • Carr v. State, 2024-CT-00185-SCT (denying cert)
  • Horne v. Dolgencorp LLC, 2024-CT-00376-SCT (denying cert)
  • Strong v. Acara Solutions, Inc., 2024-CT-00455-SCT (granting cert)
  • Rogers v. State, 2025-M-00257 (granting application for leave to proceed in the trial court)

Hand Down Page